The formal classification and results statistics demonstrated by the Club. Four classification systems, serving as a disclosure example that other clubs, NPOs, and partners can refer to.
On March 22, 2026, the Rotary Club of Taipei Sustainable Impact, District 3481, held its 36th regular meeting and consensus meeting in the form of a "Sustainable Governance Cafe Dialogue," with Members and guests jointly taking stock of the current state of Club affairs and forging a direction for the future.
The consensus of the meeting: the Club should not remain merely at holding events or routine gatherings, but should become a platform capable of integrating Members' expertise, driving the practice of service, clearly communicating value to the outside world, and continuously accumulating social impact. The report is the external language of this transformation.
IOOI (Input – Activities – Outputs – Outcomes – Impact) is an impact event-chain framework commonly used by international NPOs. The consensus camp identified five main chains for the Club over the year, serving as the narrative backbone of the report. Click the tabs below to switch between each main chain.
3/22 consensus meeting "Sustainability Report Outcome Event Chain Master Table"
The Club's impact comes from two-way relationships with eight categories of stakeholders. The consensus camp identified, for each role, their issues of concern, expectations, resources they can provide, and how the report should respond to them.
Clear direction, roles to participate in, being seen, being connected, co-creation opportunities
Professional capability, networks, time, cases, stories, service actions
Quickly understand the Club's character, know how to participate, feel genuine exchange
New perspectives, potential collaboration, future possibility of joining, network expansion
A clear path to join, seeing their own place, getting to know the Club's core members
Expertise, long-term participation, co-creation energy
Find a point of collaboration, understand what the Club can offer, reduce the uncertainty of collaboration
Venues, funding, technology, expertise, amplification of impact
Being understood, being respected, actually benefiting, continued support
Genuine feedback, change stories, insight into needs
See the Club's character, outcomes, and exemplary value
Institutional resources, awards, exposure, connection opportunities
Clear and easy to understand, trustworthy, able to generate social meaning
Public recognition, reach, support
Clear requirements, efficient collaboration, reasonable planning
Execution resources, production capabilities
3/22 consensus meeting "Stakeholder Inventory Table" (the Member and guest interview portions are not disclosed externally, per the meeting consensus)
Materiality is the core of sustainability reporting: only disclose issues that are important to both the Club and its stakeholders. The table below presents the ten issues and their priority ranking identified by the consensus camp.
3/22 consensus meeting "First Edition of the Material Issues Matrix" (first-edition ranking, to be continuously adjusted through annual reviews)
KPIs leave trackable evidence of our commitments to ourselves. The consensus camp proposed sixteen first-edition indicators across five dimensions. The table below is a category overview. For full indicator definitions, calculation methods, and tracking frequency, see the methodology page.
3/22 consensus meeting "First Edition of the KPI Indicator Table" (the first edition focuses on "priority tracking" items, with the rest introduced year by year)